I hate the nadir argument. It is the type of argument that belongs in a 'handbook' to allow 'members' (in more than one sense of the word) to belittle or confuse beginners or those less experienced.
I still call a super, a super even when underneath
I call an orange an orange even when unripe
I call a motorway a motorway when closed.
An overcoat is an overcoat regardless of being worn.
The same argument would imply supers kept in a shed over winter they would not be called a supers at all.
Also supers could not be called supers when sold in a shop due to their state.
I may use a super as a broodbox when running brood and a half.
I may use a super as an eke in an emergency, or a place to put insulation. The super has not changed its name, just its temporary purpose.
Just because a super is temporarily changed in state does not mean to say I have to change its name. If it lived under the broodbox perminently, that may be a different case.
If a super is a state and not an object, if I was asked if someone could borrow a dozen supers, I would have to say 'no' as technically they are all in use, despite having a shed full.
My honey is also not raw or pure.
Of course I might be wrong as they wait for their 'green' to turn the right colour to squeeze it into juice.
Rant off