- Joined
- Oct 16, 2012
- Messages
- 18,377
- Reaction score
- 9,785
- Location
- Fareham, Hampshire UK
- Hive Type
- 14x12
- Number of Hives
- 6
It's the condescending phrase 'more natural way' appended on the end which gets everyone's goat.
If I 'nursed' my bees dressed in nothing but an animal skin loincloth would that be classes as 'more natural' ?
It's not condescending .... or at least it's not INTENDED to be condescending ... I have no other way to describe the minimal interference/chemical free method of keeping bees. If you have a hang up about people who wish to keep bees in an unorthodox way (and what I consider to be a 'more' natural ... ie: chemical free, environment) then I can't do much about that. I don't have a problem with people who keep their bees in National hives and who choose to treat their bees with proprietary varroacide treatments, if that is their choice then I respect it ... why should you have a problem with what other people choose to do ?
In fact, I'm pretty pragmatic and if the ONLY way to preserve a colony was a chemical treatment then I would have no hesitation in using one of the proprietary products - although I would prefer to use chemicals that are found within nature ... oxalic/formic acid etc.
The insinuation (as soon as someone mentions 'natural') is that we are all 'stick 'em in a box and leave 'em to swarm until they die out from an excess of Varroa, in the meantime, affecting every other beekeeper in the area' ~ the truth is usually very far away from this. As for the caricature of a tree hugging, loin cloth clad, living off the state, hippy that is sometimes put forward to describe people who see an alternative to conventional beekeeping ... well, you won't be able to spot me at any events if that's what you are looking for !
We have a 'conventional' beekeeper in our neck of the woods who has a lot of hives which really have been neglected and have presented significant problems - he's not a 'leave alone' merchant - he's just incompetent and lazy.