psafloyd
Queen Bee
- Joined
- Sep 27, 2010
- Messages
- 3,461
- Reaction score
- 4
- Location
- London/Essex
- Hive Type
- National
- Number of Hives
- Probably about 5/6 at the moment
untainted wax.
That is a little open to debate. Depends on what you mean exactly.
Many of the cells may have been brooded in before use as storage, but as in 'untainted from cheap imported wax as possibly used in foundation (or even UK sourced wax, maybe)', certainly only the local chemical residues will be present.
If we (framed hive users) made all our own foundation from melted-out super wax each year (as our only 'high quality' material), that might be marginally better than wax from a Warre.
Cappings from framed hives is always regarded as the highest quality; better, presumably, than that from a Warre.
Could be done, but has a large cost to the honey crop. That is one reason why a Warre does not get as large a crop as from framed hives?
Regards, RAB
RAB, I KNEW you would come back on that, as you're a pedant after my own heart.
I had written virgin wax and decided to delete it and use untainted instead.
You are of course right in that it is tainted as having been used as brood. But it hasn't been used very long, as the brood moves down the 'trunk' leaving the stores behind.
But the real point is it mostly (if not totally) made from wax produced by the bees. And that was what I meant by untainted.
Of course, we wouldn't melt out our super wax each year, as that would defeat the point of running frames, wouldn't it?