Thanks for giving it consideration Wilco.
What the Coroner said wasn't that it
might have increased his chances of survival but that , " I cannot make a precise finding that the administration of adrenaline to Mr Bryers via an EpiPen would have saved his life, but I am satisfied it would have increased his chances of survival if administered within 30 minutes".
And at paragraph 116, "It is clear from the report of Dr Bell that the administration of adrenaline within 30 minutes of an anaphylactic reaction increases an individual’s chance of survival".
It's fine to make the point that "it's not the be all and end all" but in my view it's about increasing the chances of survival, and EpiPens appear certainly to be a reasonable tool in the beekeeper's first aid kit.
I know I won't change your mind or others and I'm ok with that. I'm surprised to hear the issues there with getting the EpiPens and I'm not sure about chlorphenamine that you refer to. Looking into it however, I'm reassured about the epinephrine in the EpiPen.
Epinephrine is the only effective treatment for anaphylaxis - Harvard Health