it's only the frame that is wood. You must take care not to misrepresent, both you and JKB are making sweeping statements about something you have not seen. You both carry a lot of weight on this forum, with this comes responsibility. Many on here, rightly or wrongly, look to you for advice.
The frame is made of wood, however the rollers are made from a robust plastic composite material. The item is currently being developed, the 'inventor' was careful not to make claims he could not support. One can maybe understand why he has not explored the 'jumbo' langstroth route yet, hardly a big market for this niche product.
Surely we should be giving people like this considered feedback to encourage innovation in our hobby?
BTW it is purely coincidence that this guy lives just 10 miles from me, I met him for the first time on Saturday.
Last edited by 3bees; Yesterday at 09:20 AM.
Thanks, but I can read. A wooden frame is cheap rubbish for what is required to be a fairly precision tool. It will not retain dimensional stability over years of service. Get real and understand that a proper framework is required, not a cheap numpty wooden ‘clothes horse’ frame.
He may well be your ‘mate’, I don’t know. I am simply honest and would not recommend anyone handing out multiple £100’s of pounds on something that is unlikely to make a return on investment.
You may be right about ‘carrying weight on the forum’. I would not have any weight at all if I were to recommend a poorly built item, such as this, as a good investment.
When it is dimensionally stable, I might change my mind. Until then it would most definitely not be on my shopping list. It needs a rigid metal shaft and frame. The frame, at least, is a priority before any credence can be attributed to this supposed ‘new invention’, the roller might be stable - but that might depend on the way the ends are supported.
Now go away and get him to build it properly. Then come back and show us the viability of the investment. I shall not be holding my breath until you do!