itma
Queen Bee
...
If OA is to be totally effective it should be done while there is no sealed brood. The advice we were given by Sussex Uni in November was to open the hive check for any sealed brood and remove before applying the OA, this was for both drizzle and sublimation methods.
...
This deserves a thread to itself.
Yes, LASI/Sussex (while doing a comparison of Oxalic vapourising, trickling and spraying) did 'level the playing field' by opening up and culling brood.
This was part of the protocol for that experiment. (As was opening the hives up after treatment and taking a sample of bees...)
However, while we all know that maximising Oxalic's anti-varroa efficiency means treating while the hive is broodless --- where is the research comparing the overall effect on the colony of inspection and brood-culling against conventional 'blind' treatment? ie comparing colony outcome over the next year, not merely short-term varroa kill
Yes inspection and brood culling will ensure maximal oxalic efficiency - but as many here believe, it is going to severely disrupt the colony.
Has any research been done to compare the downside (if any) of the disruption against the benefit of ensured varroa kill?
I know full well that LASI opinion is that the disruptive downside is minimal compared with the benefit of ensuring maximum varroa reduction -- but what do they base that opinion on?
And if it is actually just personal opinion - then WTF are they doing going round handing it out as "advice from Sussex Uni" ... ?
My own personal opinion (for whatever that is worth) is that, if, despite your best efforts at treatment timing, it should happen that there was sealed brood at the time of Oxalic treatment, then it simply means that, during your IPM programme, you'll be treating again, sooner rather than later.
My suspicion is that brood-culling to maximise Oxalic efficiency is only going to be worthwhile for those that do not practice IPM, and instead rely entirely upon routine autumn and winter treatment.
Last edited: