- Joined
- Jun 18, 2011
- Messages
- 6,479
- Reaction score
- 392
You may have webbed feet Derek, I certainly don't.
compare your feet to that of a chimpanzee and you will see that are webbed in comparison
You may have webbed feet Derek, I certainly don't.
quicker to selectively breed varroa than bees, shorter lifecycleYes, Ive thought about it. One could even think about engineering DWV to act against it's vector.....many possible approaches...not all are very practical thought.
Evolution is not an even process...
Does tend to ignore the fundamentally important practical issues of selective varroa breeding and how that shorter life cycle can be used and tested against bees.quicker to selectively breed varroa than bees, shorter lifecycle
Does tend to ignore the fundamentally important practical issues of selective varroa breeding and how that shorter life cycle can be used and tested against bees.
# of course, lots of Americans and others don't believe in evolution.
Bees did not evolve to an abode! Their evolution is, like any other animal, survival and reproduction. The "abodes" they are able to survive in are many and diverse. The wrong assumption is that are only suited for one type of nest site. Simple observation shows you the flaws in that. A highly insulated nest cavity may represent the ideal, but is probably not typical.
compare your feet to that of a chimpanzee and you will see that are webbed in comparison
Is not every creature still evolving to their surroundings...evolution taking place all the time, as time goes by, or do they just stay the same, do not evolve, are no different now than they were a million years ago or nine thousand years ago.
If EVERYONE stopped treating it would happen. Might not be the type of bee that is any good for beekeeping but they would evolve to survive with varroa or die.
We already know it WILL happen. There are already several examples of bees in isolation that survive with varroa with no treatment. Different mechanism's in each case.
Horseshoe crabs have been unchanged for about 250 Million years.
Even horseshoe crabs like Limulus polyphemus have changed, Gómez thinks we should retire the term altogether. "Darwin never intended it to be used seriously. The term is over-simplifying and leads to people believing that some things haven't evolved, which is so wrong.
And far more examples where they die. It would then only take 1 lethal virus mutation and those that had evolved to cope would be gone as well.
And far more examples where they die. It would then only take 1 lethal virus mutation and those that had evolved to cope would be gone as well.
Not sure what point you are making. Evolution is survival of the fittest......of course some die. But we already know from several isolated untreated areas that some WILL survive. No maybe about it.
Bees have successfully survived for millions of years. The hallmarks of a successful species. With one of the highest gene crossover rates (read potential new genes) their flexibility at adapting to new circumstances is well proven.If not, then surviving 20 yrs( a mere heartbeat in evolutionary terms) with varroa tells us nothing about their ability to form the entire gene pool.of a successful species .
.
Evolution on 6th of December...........https://scontent-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.ne...=67cdd9e5f90546cbbe69be5930ad8291&oe=5AB6733B
Evolution on 6th of December...........https://scontent-lht6-1.xx.fbcdn.ne...=67cdd9e5f90546cbbe69be5930ad8291&oe=5AB6733B
Enter your email address to join: