- Joined
- Oct 16, 2012
- Messages
- 18,309
- Reaction score
- 9,661
- Location
- Fareham, Hampshire UK
- Hive Type
- 14x12
- Number of Hives
- 6
Kirsten Trayor -- Reading a Hive from the National Honey Show. Her take on shook swarm.
Start at timeline around 45:18
I have a slight problem with the idea that a shook swarm is evil on this forum. Just the mention of the phrase can garner some pretty strong words.
Not evil .. just a completely unnecessary action which solves nothing much in the normal run of beekeeping. It's an idea that has been handed down from Doolittle (there's a clue in the name) in the 1880's as a method of swarm control - but as I understand it, the queen was then caged for a period to prevent further swarm cells. Sadly, like many ideas in beekeeping it has, mistakenly, become an accepted remedy for just about everything !
The reality is that anything that you suggest requires a shook swarm has a better remedy that is less disruptive or destructive to the bees. The oft quoted phrase 'the colony is invigorated by a shook swarm' - of course they go off like a train - they don't have much option do they ? Do the bees appreciated the disturbance ? I very much doubt it.
Perhaps it is decried so much on here is becasuse there are (and have been in the past) a lot of thinking beekeepers on here who recognise that some of these antiquated ideas are not great and should be left in the history books.