- Joined
- Oct 29, 2013
- Messages
- 453
- Reaction score
- 298
- Location
- Romford
- Hive Type
- Commercial
- Number of Hives
- 25
I'm intending to have a go at queen rearing next year. So in my usual way I like to have a plan to start with despite knowing that the bees will of course completely ignore it.
I have an old dartington hive that I've built a cloak board for to use as my cell raiser, over winter I plan to build a long hive with three frame compartments for mating nucs.
My question is around the introduction of queen's to the mating nucs.
What are the various pros and cons between placing cells into nucs Vs rearing in an incubator and introducing virgins
So far I can think of the below.
Cells should have a good acceptance rate but you don't have a chance to check the virgin over for deformity ect and if the cell has failed you lose time.
Virgins emerged in an incubator can be checked out and even marked if required with failed cells discarded but introduction is potentially riskier and using an incubator is an extra step in the process so takes a little more time.
What do you guys think?
I have an old dartington hive that I've built a cloak board for to use as my cell raiser, over winter I plan to build a long hive with three frame compartments for mating nucs.
My question is around the introduction of queen's to the mating nucs.
What are the various pros and cons between placing cells into nucs Vs rearing in an incubator and introducing virgins
So far I can think of the below.
Cells should have a good acceptance rate but you don't have a chance to check the virgin over for deformity ect and if the cell has failed you lose time.
Virgins emerged in an incubator can be checked out and even marked if required with failed cells discarded but introduction is potentially riskier and using an incubator is an extra step in the process so takes a little more time.
What do you guys think?