All convince me that British beeks are richer than we here.
You got it wrong, Finman.
Should read: All convince me that British beeks were richer than we here.
That is for those that buy the expensive stuff, of course. Some of us tend to leave a little more real honey in the hives and that makes us poorer, too, but perhaps a bit more natural for the bees and no worries the following spring with high sucrose content in the honey.
There again, perhaps these inverted sugar feeds are OK, sold off as 'honey'. So maybe they are not losing quite as much as you think! 'Converting' ambrosia to honey and then selling it will certainly increase the profits (and the reported hive crop for the year).
RAB
You got it wrong, Finman.
Should read: All convince me that British beeks were richer than we here.
That is for those that buy the expensive stuff, of course. Some of us tend to leave a little more real honey in the hives and that makes us poorer, too, but perhaps a bit more natural for the bees and no worries the following spring with high sucrose content in the honey.
There again, perhaps these inverted sugar feeds are OK, sold off as 'honey'. So maybe they are not losing quite as much as you think! 'Converting' ambrosia to honey and then selling it will certainly increase the profits (and the reported hive crop for the year).
RAB