British Black Bee

Beekeeping & Apiculture Forum

Help Support Beekeeping & Apiculture Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I would have thought that being precious about petty things like this is the reason that others can't take the subject seriously or with any respect.
can you honestly say that any of your bees are of 'pure blood'?
No, you can't, so local mongrel is as good and realistic a name as any and a bit of realism engenders a lot more respect from onlookers, as well as avoiding the perception of zealotry.
 
I would have thought that being precious about petty things like this is the reason that others can't take the subject seriously or with any respect.
can you honestly say that any of your bees are of 'pure blood'?
No, you can't, so local mongrel is as good and realistic a name as any and a bit of realism engenders a lot more respect from onlookers, as well as avoiding the perception of zealotry.
I agree. This is what comes of labelling one’s bees as something special. What on earth does it matter as long as they work for you? Does it matter if you have to feed some of them more than others if they suit in the end.
 
I agree. This is what comes of labelling one’s bees as something special. What on earth does it matter as long as they work for you? Does it matter if you have to feed some of them more than others if they suit in the end.

When I started beekeeping 60 years ago, every guy had their own special bees. It was pure love.

They were mostly hybrid black bees. No one bred black bees in those days. Hives used to have 2 boxes, the the yield was 15-20 kg.
 
I agree. This is what comes of labelling one’s bees as something special. What on earth does it matter as long as they work for you? Does it matter if you have to feed some of them more than others if they suit in the end.

There seems to be a contingent among beekeepers who strongly desire uniformity and standardisation. We've seen that lately here where many people seem irked by the many and varied approaches there have been and will continue to be in respect of beehive design.
With bees, that same need for uniformity regularly recurs, often, (to say the least), getting people quite cross with each other.
The unpredictability and fickleness of bees contributes to the unmasterable mystery of beekeeping. I consider that the randomness and impossibility of ever being able to completely anticipate and then control the outcomes to be the root of my continued attraction and perseverance with the "art".
 
Last edited:
View attachment 29334

I would of thought you having near natives you would feel the same.
I agree with him.
Is that a page from Beowolf Cooper's (posthumously published) book?

Technically, isn't he wrong???

A mongrel is an unintentional and presumably unknown crossing,
he then goes on to say that this term can no more be applied to Britain/Ireland or Italy/France, that's not a fair comparison, due to the huge imports we've had just after the Isle of Wight Disease.

He also adds the phrase Old English (and by inference Irish?) Bee as misleading, while I don't see why, because our DNA analysis over here has revealed that the bees being kept by and called Native are descended from the Dutch imports post 1923, therefore referring to the bees present here before the huge imports as Old is quite reasonable and an easy way to identify what one is referring to?

And now I'm on this hair splitting subject (you can tell I can't sleep), his definition of Hybrid is questionable as well? Is it not an intentional crossing of two Breeds/Subspecies and it is only that first generation that is referred to as a Hybrid, subsequent ones are referred to as crossings...

... ah now I'm knit picking ... the effects of insomnia.
 
That is great to hear. Were your bees tested as part of Dylan Elens study? His Sicamm talk was very interesting.
Samples from different apiaries. He wanted only locally reared, no daughters or grand daughters of an introduced queen.
Yes, it was great news but not for everyone by the look of the replies ;)
 
The unpredictability and fickleness of bees contributes to the unmasterable mystery of beekeeping. I consider that the randomness and impossibility of ever being able to completely anticipate and then control the outcomes to be the root of my continued attraction and perseverance with the "art".
Is why I am so keen to have a multicoloured apiary
 
Is that a page from Beowolf Cooper's (posthumously published) book?

Technically, isn't he wrong???

A mongrel is an unintentional and presumably unknown crossing,
he then goes on to say that this term can no more be applied to Britain/Ireland or Italy/France, that's not a fair comparison, due to the huge imports we've had just after the Isle of Wight Disease.

He also adds the phrase Old English (and by inference Irish?) Bee as misleading, while I don't see why, because our DNA analysis over here has revealed that the bees being kept by and called Native are descended from the Dutch imports post 1923, therefore referring to the bees present here before the huge imports as Old is quite reasonable and an easy way to identify what one is referring to?

And now I'm on this hair splitting subject (you can tell I can't sleep), his definition of Hybrid is questionable as well? Is it not an intentional crossing of two Breeds/Subspecies and it is only that first generation that is referred to as a Hybrid, subsequent ones are referred to as crossings...

... ah now I'm knit picking ... the effects of insomnia.
Is that a page from Beowolf Cooper's (posthumously published) book?

Technically, isn't he wrong???

A mongrel is an unintentional and presumably unknown crossing,
he then goes on to say that this term can no more be applied to Britain/Ireland or Italy/France, that's not a fair comparison, due to the huge imports we've had just after the Isle of Wight Disease.

He also adds the phrase Old English (and by inference Irish?) Bee as misleading, while I don't see why, because our DNA analysis over here has revealed that the bees being kept by and called Native are descended from the Dutch imports post 1923, therefore referring to the bees present here before the huge imports as Old is quite reasonable and an easy way to identify what one is referring to?

And now I'm on this hair splitting subject (you can tell I can't sleep), his definition of Hybrid is questionable as well? Is it not an intentional crossing of two Breeds/Subspecies and it is only that first generation that is referred to as a Hybrid, subsequent ones are referred to as crossings...

... ah now I'm knit picking ... the effects of insomnia.
No your not knit picking :)
 
I'm not
I would have thought that being precious about petty things like this is the reason that others can't take the subject seriously or with any respect.
can you honestly say that any of your bees are of 'pure blood'?
No, you can't, so local mongrel is as good and realistic a name as any and a bit of realism engenders a lot more respect from onlookers, as well as avoiding the perception of zealotry.
You know your stuff jbm !
I'm not Looking for respect and I will carry on calling them near natives or locals.
Mongrel imo is perfectly fitting for a cross bread dog.
But as you said I don't have pure blood bees but they are definitely more Amm than anything else and in time hopefully even more so.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is that a page from Beowolf Cooper's (posthumously published) book?

Technically, isn't he wrong???

A mongrel is an unintentional and presumably unknown crossing,
he then goes on to say that this term can no more be applied to Britain/Ireland or Italy/France, that's not a fair comparison, due to the huge imports we've had just after the Isle of Wight Disease.

He also adds the phrase Old English (and by inference Irish?) Bee as misleading, while I don't see why, because our DNA analysis over here has revealed that the bees being kept by and called Native are descended from the Dutch imports post 1923, therefore referring to the bees present here before the huge imports as Old is quite reasonable and an easy way to identify what one is referring to?

And now I'm on this hair splitting subject (you can tell I can't sleep), his definition of Hybrid is questionable as well? Is it not an intentional crossing of two Breeds/Subspecies and it is only that first generation that is referred to as a Hybrid, subsequent ones are referred to as crossings...

... ah now I'm knit picking ... the effects of insomnia.
"our dna analysis over here "
Who is "our"?
Where is "here"?
And a link to the dna analysis would help make sense of this post.
 
Is there any difference between Scottish, Irish, Welsh and English Amm? Apart from language. 😉
Or are some more Amm than others?
Yes, there is massive variation in each subspecies of honey bee and specialisation can happen in remarkably small districts.
Griff Jenkins, a former chair of bibba, who kept bees not a million miles away from you Dani, in cwrtnewydd, described his bees as large brown ones.
The colonsay/ oronsay bees are said to be nigh on pure Amm as are very many from the recent Irish studies.
I'm not sure of any samples done with recent dna techniques from England or Wales that get the magic above 95% Amm dna heritage, I hope I'm wrong.
For my own bees, the last time they were sampled, what I considered to be near pure actually fell slightly short of 90% Amm and what I considered to be highly hybridised (with yellow banding on the abdomen) taken as a control sample only slightly less Amm than what I considered pure!
Wasn't Jo Widdecombe on here a while ago?
I'm sure he could shed light on the cornish Amm situation, those rame peninsula bees will have been prodded and poked nearly as much as Andrew Abrahams ones on the Scottish Islands.
Anyway, in my opinion only folk with curds for brains would want to disparage native bee breeding efforts just out of personal preference.
 
Last edited:

Latest posts

Back
Top