- Joined
- Jan 13, 2015
- Messages
- 7,639
- Reaction score
- 669
- Location
- Bedfordshire, England
- Hive Type
- Langstroth
- Number of Hives
- Quite a few
As I previously stated... not a topic for the beginners section.
Perhaps this will help
As I previously stated... not a topic for the beginners section.
Forage... location... weather....
No there wasn't but you mixed your buckfast and Amm averages in your sarcastic PM so I only had your 'best' to compare with. You said none of your Amm managed 100 lbs, only my non production colonies brought in less than that, maybe you don't have the forage.
I can't understand why you would imagine that Amm should out perform highly bred bees with decades of work behind them, I certainly don't.
Yeah I know, my back garden is not the best apiary site in the world....but for the comparisons it was important I only compared hives that remained in the same apiary for those seasons.
Amm discussion always seems to become bogged down in argument. Maybe there ought to be a separate section devoted entirely to amm, similar to the political cupboard under the stairs and.where the arguments and trolling can go on to the protagonists hearts content?
Mark, you should try and compare different strains in the same apiary, it will open your eyes.
Or read "The spirit of the Hive" by Robert Page...it's a bit dry and turgid...but essentially within a strain you can select heritable lines for high or low pollen gatherers....and it turns out that high pollen gatherer's are crap honey producers and vice versa. So selectability for honey production is a genetic trait that you can breed for. It's not that Amm's don't have the potential to produce large amounts of honey, they just currently haven't been selected for this trait. Most of the controlled breeding where DNA analysis has been used to identify them as Amm's has mainly been for purity as opposed to honey gathering prowess.
Although the evidence coming for Ireland where there seems to be high proportion of pureish Amm's, suggests they are still not honey monsters...nor good tempered.
Amm discussion always seems to become bogged down in argument. Maybe there ought to be a separate section devoted entirely to amm, similar to the political cupboard under the stairs and.where the arguments and trolling can go on to the protagonists hearts content?
I think they are both capable of producing lots of honey but wonder if they were both completely 100%pure which one's would be better and this has more to do with other factors than just honey production.
Honey bees which ever species' shouldn't be kept just for there honey production alone.
I've got my hat on and the summit is calling then on to planting seeds...
Amm discussion always seems to become bogged down in argument. Maybe there ought to be a separate section devoted entirely to amm, similar to the political cupboard under the stairs and.where the arguments and trolling can go on to the protagonists hearts content?
Hear, hear please have a separate sub section for AMM, so the rest of us are not drawn into the silliness. And yes, I hold my hand up to getting drawn in .
S
The forum to chat about improving and breeding Native British bee's,apis mellifera mellifera.
... read "The spirit of the Hive" by Robert Page...
... evidence coming for Ireland where there seems to be high proportion of pureish Amm's, suggests they are still not honey monsters...nor good tempered.
I don't think so, many of the Amm breeders here are starting their apiaries of with the usual breeder(s).B+ said:Is anyone keeping track of the background so closely related lines are not crossed?
Stiffy,Stiffy said:However, you will never get a 100% pure bred Buckfast as they are continually being improved with the traits BA started
I plan to this year bucks and Amm bee's in the same apiary they will both be on the farm for the osr field beans and cider orchards .
The buckfast were from bs honey last year.
I don't plan to mix the breed's don't try and teach me to suck egg's.
The only breeding I plan to do is all amms FYI....
With maybe a bit of carnica genus for good measure .
Thanks for the Book recommendation
To be fair, there are good breeders of Amm's here in Ireland, but high honey yields (beyond 30 kilos) is very rare, and whenever claimed ... is privately doubted: Aggression is an issue, good bee handling is a MAJOR factor, but they seem to have a shorter fuse. BUT Galtee's bees have a very good reputation, mainly on placidness, remarkably so, although their 'placid' queens seems to be rather laid back throughout the season, and swarming is more of an issue - so I've been told.
Although as B+ said,
I don't think so, many of the Amm breeders here are starting their apiaries of with the usual breeder(s).
This would be a concern that I would have for the Amm's on the Isle of Man; they have a Closed Population (imports are banned), and they have recently had BIBBA members going through their hives and culling any Queens that exhibited non-Amm physical characteristics, without regard to traits "racial purity" is the goal, as here in Ireland.
Stiffy,
it is possible to get "100% pure bred Buckfast", (in much the same as B+ can get with carnica's) there is a Pedigree List of their Breeding Lines (going back to 1919), it is VERY difficult for non-Buckfast bees (new DNA) to be added to this recognized / pedigree population, but it can still occur, as with VSH.
Enter your email address to join: