AMM imports?

Beekeeping & Apiculture Forum

Help Support Beekeeping & Apiculture Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
yes I understand what you are saying;

it's just I was so taken aback whenever I read the Bill going through the Senate to see that it was defining "Native Irish Honey Bees" as merely Apis mellifera mellifera, which means the legislation will STILL allow imports of Honey Bees ... from potentially as far afield as the Middle East (Cyprus) and certainly southern France!

I listened to a Webinar a while back in which a very senior academic 'come' beekeeper within the Native Bee movement over here, conceded that IF there was a bee import ban, then the importations would just go unreported (like the one's across the Irish border), and most people can't tell at a glance from a distance the difference between a carnica and a mellifera.

Hi Apiarist - I wasn't privy to the drafting of the recent Bill but I would imagine the idea of leaving the possibility of imports of Amm back into Ireland was to do with conservation. If there was an outbreak of a disease catastrophic (less likely if there was a ban on imports) to the existing population then we would need new genes to either start again or to maintain enough genetic diversity for the surviving population to remain viable.

There could of course be unintended consequences but I think such legislation would remove the 'casual' importer from the equation.
 
French black bees are not all that early in their availability. Will not suffice for the truly early market. Cypriot are expensive and Greek are crossed on A m.cecropia which is a pretty modest bee in the north and west of UK and Ireland. Needing to get black bees early exposes you to the 'back door' possibility of early provenances such as Portugal, Spain, and Sicily being used... iberica and sicula are largely indistinguishable visually...iberica is even blacker and more uniform than the Irish bees I have seen..but you don't want either of those.

Also there might be some pretty significant opposition. On the thread when I asked about an inquiry from Ireland about setting up a breeding branch in Ireland, of the 14 rersponses I got from commercial and semi commercial beekeepers only two said they used AMM and pretty well all dismissed the 'black bee or nothing' movement as essentially amateur based and not above claiming territorial exclusivity and reserve status, albeit by repute rather than legislation, when in fact they...non AMM keepers....had over half the bees in the areas. It was very interesting once you stripped out all the hyperbole and threat that flew around..

Decided not to endorse or develop an Irish project as it was of dubious viability anyway and there is such a schism over there that It was foolish to wade into the market until there is a settled opinion. There probably never will be.

Meanwhile imports into Northern Ireland will increase...without a matching upturn in beekeeping activity there.

Hi @Into the lions den Would you consider supporting an initiative based around breeding Amm in Ireland to supply the demand here? Then the commercial bee keepers you are in contact with would know they had someone with a lot of experience helping them to develop more commercially friendly strains and it would also help the amateur bee keepers that are struggling to get hold of queens/nucs. There has been a real effort to develop more queen rearing groups over the last number of years (although Covid has slowed things down again) but so far they are still not able to meet demand.
 
.
Your speaking about Irish native black bees is like a religion. It has nothing to do with biology or with honey production.

It is like "native Finnish cow". So hugely belowed, but no one can keep them. They disappered after last war Ayshire cows and many other breeds were imported to our country.

No one has afford to keep them for fun.
The cow is about 300 kg, when modern cows are almost 1000 kg.
 
Ok - let's use Tigers as the example instead of wolves

https://news.mongabay.com/2018/10/g...erences between,fur with thick, black stripes.

I think this study can help peoples understanding of what is being discussed. No one in Ireland claims that our Amm population are not the European Dark honeybee. What genetic mapping has shown so far is that there are populations of Amm within Ireland that share less genetic markers with their European relatives. This suggests that the Amm population has survived here in isolation for quite some time. Then at a certain point there was importation of Dutch and French Amm - this is also reflected in the genetics of the population here. Some people try to hijack this then to suggest that that devalues Amm here in some way or makes it less worthy of conservation. It is a strange logic.

If mainland Europe had a functioning Amm population through its whole former range there would be genetic mixing on a constant basis. Irish Amm if it had not been influenced by humans would most likely have become it's own subspecies eventually in the same way the Sumatran Tiger due to its island isolation became its own subspecies. Or some of the Apis subspecies of the mediterranean islands.

To continue that thought, the Irish population is what it is today due to people bringing in other genetics and influencing through selection. Is it conservation to try and preserve it as it is, or is it conservation to allow the process to continue?

A (true) parallel example; my grandpa had an old house which was a listed building. He did some research and found that the house was significantly different to what it was when it was first built. Bits had been added on or changed to suit the needs of successive owners and the house became a composite with many different quirks and evidence of the different architectural styles through time. It was a lovely house. However, because it was listed he was required to fix things in a certain way 'in keeping' with the house in order to preserve it for future generations, and he couldn't modernise parts to make it more efficient, such as installing double glazing, without significant cost and difficulty. In the end it became too expensive to manage so he sold it and moved to a smaller, newer house. Ultimately, like many old buildings, the cost of preserving the exact form that we have becomes so expensive that people stop bothering. However, to remain truly in keeping with the heritage of the house, it would arguably have made more sense to allow him to adapt and modernise it as that would have added another facet to the history of the house and made it more functional.
 
.
Your speaking about Irish native black bees is like a religion. It has nothing to do with biology or with honey production.

It is like "native Finnish cow". So hugely belowed, but no one can keep them. They disappered after last war Ayshire cows and many other breeds were imported to our country.

No one has afford to keep them for fun.
The cow is about 300 kg, when modern cows are almost 1000 kg.

Bees aren't cows though are they. You are also the one that seems immune to science. Are the scientists that compared the genomes of tiger subspecies just making it all up? Or is one Finnish bee keeper correct in his opinion.
As you have explained and I have taken that on board now - honey bees are not native to Finland so why do you have any interest in what goes on in places where they are?
 
Bees aren't cows though are they. You are also the one that seems immune to science. Are the scientists that compared the genomes of tiger subspecies just making it all up? Or is one Finnish bee keeper correct in his opinion.
As you have explained and I have taken that on board now - honey bees are not native to Finland so why do you have any interest in what goes on in places where they are?

Bees aren't tigers either; or did I miss something?
Are people only entitled to be interested in matters which relate to their own country?
 
To continue that thought, the Irish population is what it is today due to people bringing in other genetics and influencing through selection. Is it conservation to try and preserve it as it is, or is it conservation to allow the process to continue?

A (true) parallel example; my grandpa had an old house which was a listed building. He did some research and found that the house was significantly different to what it was when it was first built. Bits had been added on or changed to suit the needs of successive owners and the house became a composite with many different quirks and evidence of the different architectural styles through time. It was a lovely house. However, because it was listed he was required to fix things in a certain way 'in keeping' with the house in order to preserve it for future generations, and he couldn't modernise parts to make it more efficient, such as installing double glazing, without significant cost and difficulty. In the end it became too expensive to manage so he sold it and moved to a smaller, newer house. Ultimately, like many old buildings, the cost of preserving the exact form that we have becomes so expensive that people stop bothering. However, to remain truly in keeping with the heritage of the house, it would arguably have made more sense to allow him to adapt and modernise it as that would have added another facet to the history of the house and made it more functional.

Correction - part of the Irish Amm population shows genetic markers from the introduction of Dutch and/or French bees.

I think conserving animal/plant/insect species and their subspecies is different to conserving houses. Amm are not lost in any way - diminished in their range for sure but they still exist - so it is on us to support them in every way we can.
 
Bees aren't tigers either; or did I miss something?
Are people only entitled to be interested in matters which relate to their own country?
Did you read the article I posted? Tigers aren't the important thing. It is how scientists treat subspecies and how their genetics are influenced over time by isolation from other populations with in their own overall species. Finman has made assertions that scientists don't believe this has value anymore. In that case all Tigers are just tigers - whether they come from Siberia, Sumatra or India. In the same way he thinks bees are just bees wherever they come from.

Finman then tries to compare Bees to a rare breed of cow. It is not the same - unless you think bees are domesticated? I have kept Dexter cows myself - they have their value and are worth conserving but are not fundamental parts of an eco-system in the way honey-bees are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mbc
Bees aren't cows though are they. You are also the one that seems immune to science. Are the scientists that compared the genomes of tiger subspecies just making it all up? Or is one Finnish bee keeper correct in his opinion.
As you have explained and I have taken that on board now - honey bees are not native to Finland so why do you have any interest in what goes on in places where they are?

Bees are cows you know it very well. ... you invented that , not me. But angry British people use to push stupid ideas to anothers' mount and then start tjeir inyelligeny poking. I have tired to that native habit of you Islanders

I have studied biology and genetics in Helsinki university. I know enough about beekeeping (60 year) and I am able to read biological articles with English language.. It is not difficult.

But I see, that even scientific articles has been written with native English language, it is difficult to understand, if you do not have basic biological education or wider knowledge about life

Before honeybee DNA mapping it was written that European honeybee was born in Europa and it spreaded then to Asia and splitted to Asian honeybee and to European honeybee.

I have not invented none of this stories

But it is 100% true, that honeybees has not eveloped in Ireland, on the opposite edge of the world. All Apis relative speci live in South East Asia.
So simple.

There was one guy in this forum, who claimed, that honeybee has evolved in Tamar Valley. And now that thinking has spreaded to every valley of British Isles
 
Correction - part of the Irish Amm population shows genetic markers from the introduction of Dutch and/or French bees.

I think conserving animal/plant/insect species and their subspecies is different to conserving houses. Amm are not lost in any way - diminished in their range for sure but they still exist - so it is on us to support them in every way we can.

AMM lives in Europe that is sure. I saw a genetic research from Russia. It was said that in Russia 64% out if genes are from Black bees and other genes are other races. Note that Russia is the largest country on globe. Problem in Russia is, that all bees are hybrids. Hard to find pure bee races.

Almost native bee race is Caucasian. When Soviet Union splitted, perhaps Caucasian is not any more Russian native.

American Russian bee was introduced from Vladivostok region. It stands varroa. It was researched that Amerikan Russian bee has Caucasian DNA. But then it was researched, that that corner of Siberia has all kinds of race hybrids. It depends how beekeepers migrate and move their hives.
 
Last edited:
Not sure I follow that logic. Surely, if the claim of a pure Irish gene pool is accepted (for the sake of argument), it is the case that all Irish bees would be AMM but not all AMM would be Irish Bees.
NO my friend you are WRONG :)
I couldn't believe it myself when I read it, surely this can't be right I thought, so here's a quote from the proposed Legislation in Ireland going through the Irish Senate:

" PROTECTION OF THE NATIVE IRISH HONEY BEE BILL 2021...
Definitions
1. In this Act— ...
“native Irish honey bee” means the European Dark Honey Bee classified as Apis
mellifera mellifera and includes such bees at any stage in their life. "

there you go :rolleyes:
IF this Bill is passed into Law, it means the Irish Government will define the bees that you see in rural France as the “native Irish honey bee”.

Just let that sink in for a while ... I am still trying to get my head around that one!
 
NO my friend you are WRONG :)
I couldn't believe it myself when I read it, surely this can't be right I thought, so here's a quote from the proposed Legislation in Ireland going through the Irish Senate:

" PROTECTION OF THE NATIVE IRISH HONEY BEE BILL 2021...
Definitions
1. In this Act— ...
“native Irish honey bee” means the European Dark Honey Bee classified as Apis
mellifera mellifera and includes such bees at any stage in their life. "

there you go :rolleyes:
IF this Bill is passed into Law, it means the Irish Government will define the bees that you see in rural France as the “native Irish honey bee”.

Just let that sink in for a while ... I am still trying to get my head around that one!

That is good.
 
I read a story from Wikipedia about German Black Bee ideology during Nazi time in Germany.

And now it is ordered that all German bees must be Carniolans.
 
Hi @Into the lions den Would you consider supporting an initiative based around breeding Amm in Ireland to supply the demand here? Then the commercial bee keepers you are in contact with would know they had someone with a lot of experience helping them to develop more commercially friendly strains and it would also help the amateur bee keepers that are struggling to get hold of queens/nucs. There has been a real effort to develop more queen rearing groups over the last number of years (although Covid has slowed things down again) but so far they are still not able to meet demand.

Waited overnight to consider my response to this as it could be seen as deliberately provocative. One death threat if I ever set foot on the island of Ireland with bees was enough, never mind the diatribe from both sides and constant reposting the *very* incomplete tabloid coverage of our 2009 OTC case. (I make no apology for saving the bees.) Contrasted completely with the civilised and polite exchanges I had off stage with Aoife Macgiollacoda on the subject.

OK..lets go. The initiative proposed was at the behest of a group of Irish beekeepers of varying scales but slanted to the professional end. Most of them had, at some stage, had the Jolanta line queens we raise here, and were very much wanting regular supplies. With Brexit making legal movements difficult at best (unless you just post them devoid of paperwork....lots of that happening) they wondered if it was a possibility we would consider establishing an Irish unit. It was NOT my idea. I agreed to investigate so posted on several fora to canvass opinion. Did NOT go to the Irish forum which was perhaps an error at the time but with hindsight was probably best as opinions seem to become so enflamed so quickly.

The points mostly coming to me were that Irish queen prices are at a level that precludes viable commercial use and that, despite the prices being so high, availability is always difficult and sometimes impossible. The biggest producer only does a few hundred and single operations could use up that number on their own.

Of the 14 commercials and semi commercials that replied 12 wanted non Amm stock. Of that 12 a few import directly from southern Europe already and would never bee clients for later availability and higher priced (though not as high as current rates...we wanted the larger clients mainly) Irish raised stock we would provide. 6 offered to provide the locations for the project. All but one of the commercials said they kept their heads down over there as they can come under attack. Irish beekeepers applied for jobs in the mooted unit.. Another couple offered to come and train here to then run the Irish unit for us.

Based on the fairly scanty statistics in the mails I got I concluded that, of those interested in buying queens from the unit only about 25% of the demand was for Amm. A similar number wanted Buckfasts (mainly those already importing). Most just wanted good quiet healthy bees that got a crop irrespective of racial origin. This is what the Jolanta project is actually all about...very nice content bees that give a minimum of management issues yet grow strong and productive. They do very nicely in Ireland already.

It is plain than there is a gap in the market for real commercial queen rearing but is it enough to carry a full time business? Why has it not happened already?

The Amm market is primarily into the ones and twos trade...its the same here. The bigger clients on whom the success of a venture would depend are mainly in the 'just want good bees' class, unless they already import Buckfast.

So having gone through all the responses it could be seen that the Amm market was too small and mainly comprised the ones and twos market where they are often the most time consuming customers. The commercial market was a possible avenue but they did not generally want Amm, and the key customers were already importing themselves at prices an Irish based unit could not compete with. The remainder MIGHT constitute a market for a single person working on it doing a relatively modest 1500 queens a year. Quite easy to achieve, but if you take commercially viable pricing on 1500 minus all the costs and the wages, it works out pretty marginal. Add in the difficulties of being in what seems like a beekeeping war zone it was a pretty easy decision to make.....a non starter.

We would have used it just as an extension of the programme we have here which breeds bees very suited to Ireland and were the basis for people asking in the first place. Our selection criteria are severe...having over 4000 to choose from and a willingness to incorporate fresh lines from inside and outside our unit gives us a lot of genetic diversity and we really believe in that as it is what puts resilience into the stock. This does not sit easily with the narrower aims of the Amm movement. Our criteria are about the traditional reasons for keeping bees..a symbiotic arrangement where our rewards come from the various harvests (honey, wax, pollination etc) whereas in recent years a more conservation minded movement has grown up essentially from the amateur ranks, but also with some academics on board, in which purity in breeding has relegated the traditionally desirable attributes to a secondary role. Our criteria stand accused of being anti Amm as we like large gentle vigorous colonies with high brood fertility and an absence of disease. An example being that Jolanta allows a maximum of three cells of chalk brood in her breeder colonies..any more and they get evicted back to the main unit. Apparently this is us discriminating against Amm in which chalk is often an issue..

Late edit...you note I did not mention productivity. That's because that is the first hurdle any stock has to cross....the selection takes place ONLY among the proven producers.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top